![]() This dichotomy of relationship with your players has to be in balance. If you are too lenient, you need to have a disciplinarian on your staff and give him your full support. ![]() You set policies for the guild, and if those policies are founded on a terrible grasp of the game, your good players will leave (if you are lucky they won’t suicide you first).Ģ) If you are anti-social, you need to get a people person on your staff and give that person your full support. As a GM, you are expected to have a solid knowledge of the game. And you know the techs already.ġ) If you fail as a player, you won’t do better as a GM. Your fleets however CAN die.Ħ) the best advantage of being occupied : you don’t have to scout for a target to kill. You need your own JG.ĥ) protect fleet - your bases don’t DIE. Your friends may be occupied or switch guilds on you. Scrapping obsolete turrets in favor of Command centers during occupation is wise stewardship.ģ) Know what the enemy uses as his spec, so you can build the proper “anti-spec”Ĥ) All bases should have a JG. ![]() And during occupation laser turrets and planetary rings give the same benefit : NONE.Ģ) Command Centers work during occupation when turrets do not. Overbuilding turrets do not deter a determined enemy. You are still going to be hit and the enemy will still try to permanently occupy you. Now what does the occupied player do that doesn’t involve quitting, relocating, or restarting?ġ) In the enemy stronghold galaxy, turrets don’t actually MATTER. There is a flip side - for every occupier there is an occupied player.
0 Comments
I begin with the apparatus of memory itself. What if this space is (one of many?) under threat, partly because digital databases and artefact-based archives offer different types of permanence, openness or accessibility? If this is so, it begs the question: what did photography do for memory and what contribution has photography made to the practice of memory in human culture? Has photography affected or changed the constitution of individual or collective memory, in what way, what are its effects, on whose memories, how and why? To address such questions I want to start somewhere else, so as to return to photography differently. In domestic culture, photography conventionally has a place as a time machine, a device for remembering. If we see these new repositories as a type of “memory bank”, complemented by the many devices designed to provide inputs to them like camera phones (and, of course, the computers and hard disks that support them, which are types of archives in themselves), then we have to ask what relation do these instruments have to existing notions of memory and photography? Is this why interest in the archive and memory is so current? Or is it also to do with the multitude of archives, whether commercial like Getty and corporate institutions or state-owned collections, museums, public-lending libraries, private family attics, artists' estates and so on, which is creating an unease about archives and potential memories? As embodied in the title of his little book Archive Fever, Jacques Derrida notes that an anxiety about memory always has an element of death or “destruction drive”, “of loss” at work in it (9).Ĭertainly, new photo-archiving software programmes like Aperture, i-Photo, i-View, and Lightroom have accelerated the issue of how to archive photographic images and what to do with them once deposited. ![]() ![]() As “photography” mutates into its digital double (like a sister or brother) whose system operates in a different way and is still in the process of re-definition, what we thought photography was, is and will be remains in flux. They captured the lighting beautifully!!! We are thrilled with the results and truly happy we met such great people like Laura and Drew in this process.Some may detect in the title of this paper an ambiguity between the memory of photography as a technology that is “outmoded”, past its sell-by date, and photography as an “aide-memoire” machine to the human memory process of remembering. After getting the photos back it seemed like they were everywhere at once but I never even noticed them! Amazing! And when we got the final photos!!!! We loved them! They are so beautiful. Throughout the night they were helping, checking if we needed anything, always were getting the photos. We aren’t used to being in front of the camera but Laura and Drew made us feel so comfortable, and gave us guidance when we didn’t know what to do. ![]() So fun to be around! And sooooo helpful! From the first time I talked to Laura she was responsive, enthusiastic, and really down to earth! We totally clicked! She has a great planning process and questionnaire sheet to ensure that we got all the photographs that we wanted on our day and we wouldn’t have to be thinking about anything during the process. ![]() "Laura and Drew were awesome! They were so easy to get along with. ![]() OpenSUSE Leap 15.4: new seamonkey packages. ![]() OpenSUSE Leap 15.3: new seamonkey packages. OpenSUSE Leap 15.3: new MozillaThunderbird packages (). ![]() OpenSUSE Leap 15.3: new MozillaFirefox packages (). OpenSUSE Leap 15.2: new MozillaThunderbird packages. OpenSUSE Leap 15.2: new MozillaFirefox packages (). Solutions for this threat Firefox: version 91.0.1. The trust level is of type confirmed by the editor, with an origin of internet server.Īn attacker with a expert ability can exploit this weakness alert. Our Vigilance Vulnerability Alerts team determined that the severity of this vulnerability is medium. This cybersecurity vulnerability impacts software or systems such as Fedora, Firefox, SeaMonkey, Thunderbird, openSUSE Leap, Solaris, SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop, SLES, Ubuntu. Vulnerable products: Fedora, Firefox, SeaMonkey, Thunderbird, openSUSE Leap, Solaris, SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop, SLES, Ubuntu. Otherwise I am said to have to look elsewhere.Vulnerability of Firefox | Thunderbird: information disclosure via HTTP/3 Responses Header Splitting Synthesis of the vulnerabilityĪn attacker can bypass access restrictions to data via HTTP/3 Responses Header Splitting of Firefox | Thunderbird, in order to obtain sensitive information. If the problems have indeed been addressed and this program is working again, it would be nice for whoever is maintaining it to change it to "v1.6" (or the like) add a note under the download that it has been updated and is working for the latest versions of FF. They just see MozBU seemingly working flawlessly to BU their FF and assume it will restore it when the time comes. I am afraid the 4 and 5 star reviews are from people who have not tried to actually restore FF. Unless this project has been taken up by someone who has made it compatible with the newest versions of FF, it can no longer be trusted. I notice the version that appears here has been updated as of Dec 2016, however it's the same numerical version I have, so ? I ended up having to restore FF by copy/pasting all Mozilla folders from a BU I had of my entire drive on an external, to my laptop. No error msg's in BU or restore process, so it appears to work, but fails to restore a working FF. But the last time I tried restoring FF (v37.0.1) from this program it did not succeed in restoring FF. I used MozBU v1.5.1 for years flawlessly to both BU and restore FF. |